To begin with, I had a delightful interview with Mr. and Mrs. Charles “Ted” Tracy at the Nottingham recently. Ted turns 97 soon and is the youngest son of James and Florida Tracy. James was church president from 1929-1931 and Florida was involved in maintaining our church history for many years. I have mentioned Florida several times in past articles. Ted had many delightful memories and remembered Rev. Applebee and Rev. Argow quite well. At some future point we will make several of our interviews available so that interested people can also delight in such wonderful recollections. Speaking of past newsletter articles on our history, you can now read them online at http://history.mmuus.org/newsletterarchives.pdf.
Now to that notion of turmoil mentioned above. Sam May was among a few leading Unitarian ministers more than 150 years ago who worked diligently to convince leaders of the American Unitarian Association (AUA) to take a strong and decisive stance in support of abolition, but in vain. In his Recollections book he stated the following: “The Unitarians as a body dealt with the question of slavery in any but an impartial, courageous, and Christian way” (p. 336). Dr. Henry Ingersoll Bowditch, a leading abolitionist of the time, noted that Unitarians as a body were “as rotten as ever” on the topic of slavery (this comes from a paper entitled “Abolitionist Minister: Samuel J. May Opposes the Fugitive Slave Law” written by Rev. Armida Alexander, minister of the Glacier Unitarian Universalist Fellowship, Kalispell, Montana). A number of Unitarian ministers actually lost their positions due to their antislavery activities, including our Sam May’s nephew, Rev. Samuel May, Jr.
It was mainly through the efforts of abolitionists like Samuel Joseph May that the AUA was forced to redefine its relationship to all Unitarian ministers. But in Sam’s mind, the change was very slow to come as most Unitarian ministers wanted calm and stability in their churches because, after all, many leading politicians, business owners, and community leaders were often in their pews and they did not want to rock the boat. Sam expected more of his colleagues and in his Recollections he said this about the power and duty of the pulpit to effect change: “The pulpit has no higher function than to expound, assert, and maintain the rights of man” (p. 358). He believed that when the pulpit was “false to its charge,” there were horrible consequences throughout society. He was very disappointed, too, in national leaders like former friend, Daniel Webster, and President Millard Fillmore, a Unitarian, who supported the Fugitive Slave Law.
But Sam, like a few other Unitarian ministers, kept up the fight. After the President of the Syracuse and Utica Railroad heard one of Sam’s antislavery sermons, he ordered his employees that if they ever saw any recaptured fugitive slave on his train they were to stop it, remove the irons, and set the person free. And, of course, the famous Jerry Rescue helped to mobilize people in New York and beyond, beginning a true wave of repulsion against the Fugitive Slave Act. Unfortunately, it wasn’t until 1889 that the AUA began efforts to reconcile the many differences among its members. I’m sure that Sam would have been happy to know it eventually happened.
Rog Hiemstra, Archivist
Written February 11, 2008